Attention and contemplative practice
Investigate attention, stillness, and reflective experience through defined tasks, participant reports, and physiological observations. Treat descriptions of practice as evidence to understand in context.
Human experience belongs at the centre of the science.
We connect inquiry into attention, awareness, and reflective experience with cognitive science, computational methods, and Indic traditions. Our research partner in this vertical is CPCSci—the Center for Philosophical and Cognitive Sciences at ISS Delhi.
First-person reports and physiological observations offer different kinds of evidence. We are interested in study designs that bring them into dialogue: how attention changes, how people describe practice, and how interpretation shapes what technology can responsibly say about wellbeing.
Center for Philosophical
and Cognitive Sciences
CPCSci at the Institute for Science and Spirituality, Delhi brings philosophical, empirical, and computational inquiry together across cognition, consciousness, complex systems, and wellbeing.
Our partnership connects ManasAI’s applied research direction with this interdisciplinary setting for studying attention, awareness, and human experience.
Explore CPCSci ↗Questions guiding this vertical and its contribution to intelligence for inner wellbeing.
Investigate attention, stillness, and reflective experience through defined tasks, participant reports, and physiological observations. Treat descriptions of practice as evidence to understand in context.
Engage with philosophical and cognitive accounts of perception, awareness, and agency. Use formal models to make assumptions explicit and empirical methods to examine the questions those assumptions generate.
Examine how AI-generated interpretations and feedback influence the meaning people assign to their experience. Preserve room for reflection, disagreement, and individual agency.
Develop a precise question with researchers and practitioners.
Gather contextualised accounts of participants’ experience.
Collect physiological and behavioural observations with consent.
Compare evidence, examine assumptions, and state the limits.
Selected work by our scientific lead and collaborators. Each paper is credited to its authors; publication status is shown alongside the source.
A framework for examining how AI shapes meaning and experience. It extends ethical analysis from observable behaviour to the representations through which people understand and act in the world.
Design implication: assess how feedback frames experience and affects agency, as well as whether a model’s output is accurate.
Read author manuscriptAn investigation of context-sensitive probability judgements in six open-weight language models. The reported departures from classical probability vary by model; they do not establish a universal quantum signature.
Research implication: evaluate consistency, framing, and question-order effects alongside answer accuracy.
Read published articleThese works inform the research agenda. They do not constitute validation of SakshiSense hardware or wellness outcomes.
This work informs how we study stress, attention, and meditation—and how we communicate the results. It encourages feedback that supports understanding while recognising that a physiological signal is only one part of a person’s experience.
Explore the wellness platform ↗We welcome collaborations across cognitive science, contemplative studies, philosophy, and responsible AI.