Personalised multimodal models
Explore physiological time series alongside movement, task events, and participant reports. Study individual adaptation and evaluate how models behave across people, sessions, and settings.
Intelligence that understands context deserves equally thoughtful evaluation.
We work at the intersection of multimodal learning, language models, and personalised inference. Our focus is on systems that combine useful predictions with a clear account of their evidence, context, and limitations.
A person’s baseline, the task they are performing, and the way a question is framed all matter. We investigate how AI can combine these sources of context, and how its behaviour changes when they do. The goal is to develop applications that researchers can scrutinise, adapt, and evaluate.
Questions guiding this vertical and its contribution to intelligence for inner wellbeing.
Explore physiological time series alongside movement, task events, and participant reports. Study individual adaptation and evaluate how models behave across people, sessions, and settings.
Develop retrieval and reasoning approaches for domain-specific and Indic knowledge. Source traceability, cultural context, and careful evaluation guide this work on reflective and research-facing applications.
Investigate probability consistency, contextual framing, and order effects. A model that answers well in one prompt may behave differently under a changed context; those differences belong in the evaluation.
Define the use case and what a useful answer would mean.
Connect relevant signals, sources, and study context.
Test accuracy, consistency, uncertainty, and variation.
Study adaptation to individuals without losing sight of limitations.
Selected work by our scientific lead and collaborators. Each paper is credited to its authors; publication status is shown alongside the source.
An investigation of context-sensitive probability judgements in six open-weight language models. The reported departures from classical probability vary by model; they do not establish a universal quantum signature.
Research implication: evaluate consistency, framing, and question-order effects alongside answer accuracy.
Read published articleA framework for examining how AI shapes meaning and experience. It extends ethical analysis from observable behaviour to the representations through which people understand and act in the world.
Design implication: assess how feedback frames experience and affects agency, as well as whether a model’s output is accurate.
Read author manuscriptThese works inform the research agenda. They do not constitute validation of SakshiSense hardware or wellness outcomes.
For stress and attention research, a prediction only becomes meaningful in the setting of the study. This vertical develops the inference and evaluation methods that can connect SakshiSense data to personalised models and, over time, carefully designed feedback.
Explore the wellness platform ↗Bring a use case, a dataset, or an evaluation challenge. Let’s define the research together.